You're asking: "Why do we have all these DEI policies and nothing actually changes?" That's the question we hear from practitioners constantly. And the short answer is: because a policy on paper is not inclusion in practice. The single most effective move you can make this year is to conduct an equal-pay audit and close the gaps you find. Here's the truth behind the policies.
Are DEI policies actually working?
Let's look at the numbers. A 2024 Conference Board survey found that four-fifths of U.S. workers support their organization's DEI efforts, and more than two-thirds say DEI positively impacts their work experience (The Conference Board, 2024). That's real support. But here's the catch: only 58% of organizations have conducted an equal-pay audit, and just 53% have taken steps to close pay gaps (The Conference Board, 2024). So we have widespread support for DEI, but less than six in ten employers have actually checked whether they're paying people fairly. That's a disconnect. Policies are easy; audits are hard. But audits are what drive change.
Myth: "DEI is just a fad" — what's the real business case?
The myth that DEI is a passing trend ignores the financial evidence. In a 2026 study, companies scoring high on the HRC Corporate Equality Index had an 8x higher net income compared with their lower-scoring peers (HRC Corporate Equality Index, 2026). That's not a feel-good stat; it's a bottom-line difference. Similarly, Great Place to Work India's 2024 report found that more than 70% of organizations believe prioritizing DEIB spurred greater innovation, reduced attrition, and increased productivity (Great Place to Work India, 2024). And the World Health Organization estimates that for every US$1 spent on disability-inclusive prevention and care for noncommunicable diseases, almost US$10 could be returned (World Health Organization, 2023). So the business case is not just about avoiding lawsuits; it's about performance.
How do I start a pay audit if my company has never done one?
Start small but start now. A pay audit doesn't have to be a massive consulting project. First, get the data: gather compensation by gender, race/ethnicity, and disability status, if you have it. Then compare pay within similar job categories. If you find a gap of 5% or more between male and female workers in a category, and you can't justify it on objective, gender-neutral criteria, you need to fix it—that's the standard set by the EU Pay Transparency Directive (EU) 2023/970 (EU Pay Transparency Directive, 2023). In the UK, employers with 250 or more employees are already legally required to publish their gender pay gap annually (UK gov.uk Gender Pay Gap Guidance). So if you're in the UK, you have no excuse. If you're in the U.S., the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission filed 13 new systemic discrimination cases in FY2024, a sign that enforcement is active (EEOC FY2024 Enforcement Data, 2024). Don't wait for a complaint.
Is pay equity really a disability issue too?
Yes, and it's one we often ignore. The UK's Office for National Statistics reported that in 2020, autistic people aged 16-64 had an employment rate of just 21.7%, compared to 53.6% for the disabled population as a whole (UK ONS Disabled Outcomes, 2021). And the UK disability employment gap in Q2 2025 was 29.7 percentage points (UK DWP Employment of Disabled People, 2025). That gap means fewer disabled people are in work at all, let alone in well-paid jobs. But pay equity isn't just about who's in the door. The Job Accommodation Network found that 61% of workplace accommodations cost nothing, and the median one-time cost for those that did cost was $300 (Job Accommodation Network, JAN). So the fear that accommodations are expensive is a myth—and it's a barrier to hiring and retaining disabled talent.
Doesn't focusing on pay audits ignore other inclusion issues like belonging?
No—belonging and pay equity are connected. HBR's 2019 piece on the BetterUp study found that 40% of people feel isolated at work, which is linked to lower commitment (Harvard Business Review, 2019). And employees who feel belonging are 4.3x more likely to look forward to work, and those experiencing DEI are 3.4x more likely to stay long-term (Great Place to Work India, 2024). But you can't feel a sense of belonging if you're being paid less than your peers for the same work. Pay inequity is a fundamental signal of who is valued. So when you close pay gaps, you're directly addressing a core driver of exclusion.
Isn't the gender pay gap already closed in the UK?
Not even close. The gender pay gap among full-time UK employees was 6.9% in April 2025, down only slightly from 7.1% a year earlier (UK ONS Gender Pay Gap, 2025). And it's widest in mid-career: for full-time employees aged 40-49, the gap is 9.1%, compared to 3.9% for those aged 30-39 (UK ONS Gender Pay Gap, 2025). That pattern tells us that women's earnings stall just as they hit peak career years—likely due to caregiving responsibilities and other systemic barriers. So no, the gap is not closed, and it won't close on its own.
What about the myth that "DEI training is useless"?
There's some truth to that—but not for the reason you think. U.S. businesses spend nearly $8 billion each year on DEI training that 'misses the mark' because it neglects employees' need to feel included (Harvard Business Review, 2019). So the problem isn't DEI training per se; it's that most training is a one-off event that doesn't change behavior. What works is embedding inclusion into everyday practices: involving disabled people in decision-making (remember 'Nothing about us without us'), providing accommodations, and making sure your policies are actually followed (Local Government Association, UK). That's why we recommend pairing any training with a concrete action like a pay audit. Training without structural change is just theater.
Quick tip: If you're going to run a pay audit, involve your employee resource groups and be transparent about the methodology. Secrecy breeds suspicion; openness builds trust.
Bottom line
The best single move you can make is to conduct an equal-pay audit this year—and if you find gaps, create a plan to close them. That's the policy that actually changes lives.
Sources
- The Conference Board (2024) - https://www.conference-board.org/publications/Beyond-Backlash-The-Continued-Benefits-of-Inclusion-at-Work
- Great Place to Work India (2024) - https://www.greatplacetowork.in/
- Harvard Business Review (2019) - https://hbr.org/2019/12/the-value-of-belonging-at-work
- Job Accommodation Network (JAN) - https://askjan.org/topics/costs.cfm
- UK ONS Gender Pay Gap (2025) - https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/earningsandworkinghours/bulletins/genderpaygapintheuk/latest
- EU Pay Transparency Directive (2023) - https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2023/970/oj
Comments (0)
Please sign in to post a comment.
Don't have an account? Create one
No comments yet. Be the first to comment!